ROI
About halfthe time per entry to fill
No rebuilding your day from memory. AI fills in the project and description. Review it. Accept it. Move on.1
About 9 in 10reviewed suggestions accepted
The final say is always yours. Check each suggestion. Change what you want. Dismiss what you don't.2
About 10%more time logged per weekday
Client messages. Short meetings. Small tasks. They add up. Hours marked billable rose by about 14%.3
- All logged hours
- Before AI5.9 h per weekdayAfter first AI use6.5 h per weekday
- Hours marked billable
- Before AI4.7 h per weekdayAfter first AI use5.3 h per weekday
See your ROI.
Costs and assumptions
Costs are per person. Subscription is Premium, billed annually. Already on a paid plan? Set it to $0. AI usage is an estimate and depends on your model.
Estimated net value per year
8 minutes of billed work per person, per month covers the cost.
- Less timesheet admin120 hours a year
- +$4,800
- More client work captured792 hours a year
- +$79,200
- AI and subscription$12.99 per person, per month
- -$1,559
- ROINet value divided by cost
- 53x
An estimate based on your inputs, not a guarantee. Your results will vary.
Footnotes
-
Median time between consecutive entries in product and timesheet data, September to November 2026: about 10 seconds to accept an AI suggestion, about 20 seconds for a manual entry on the web, and about 25 seconds for a manual entry in the app. ↩
-
Based on suggestions that people accepted or dismissed in the app, August to November 2026. People can still edit an entry after they accept it. ↩
-
These are observations from product usage and timesheet data, not guaranteed savings. The chart compares the same existing TimeCamp users before and after first AI use, using four-week weekday averages. Workload and other changes can affect the results. Time marked billable doesn't always become invoiced or paid revenue, so review each entry and its billable status before you invoice. People who already logged most of their week saw little change. ↩